On 8/25/2013 9:09 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–08–25 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The \starttexdefintion command looks for the “unexpanded” keyword
only when you apply also a argument but not when the arguments
are missing, i.e.
Thanks for the explanation. Is that a bug or expected behaviour?
On 2013–08–26 Hans Hagen wrote:
not a bug ... just not implemented (as it's pretty complex to do
that case efficiently at the tex end)
anyhow, as it seems to be needed, i redid the code and now we have:
[…]
so, three optional qualifiers (also in that order), so you'd better
wikify it
Hi,
the following example produces an “Undefined control sequence”
error. If \def is used instead of \starttexdefinition then there is
no error. Why?
\starttexcode
\installcommandhandler{foo}{foo}{foo}
\appendtoks
\setuevalue{start\currentfoo}{\foo@start[\currentfoo]}%%
Am 25.08.2013 um 19:40 schrieb Marco Patzer li...@homerow.info:
Hi,
the following example produces an “Undefined control sequence”
error. If \def is used instead of \starttexdefinition then there is
no error. Why?
The \starttexdefintion command looks for the “unexpanded” keyword
only when
On 2013–08–25 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The \starttexdefintion command looks for the “unexpanded” keyword
only when you apply also a argument but not when the arguments
are missing, i.e.
Thanks for the explanation. Is that a bug or expected behaviour?
I think it's odd that
Am 25.08.2013 um 21:09 schrieb Marco Patzer li...@homerow.info:
On 2013–08–25 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The \starttexdefintion command looks for the “unexpanded” keyword
only when you apply also a argument but not when the arguments
are missing, i.e.
Thanks for the explanation. Is that a
